The same name on the shares and on the door.
A family office holds operating companies the way a sponsor does, with one difference: the owners' room and the operators' room may share a surname, a dinner table and thirty years of memory. A decision to exit, to expand abroad, to bring in outside management is a decision about identity as much as EBITDA, and identity does not appear on a deck.
For the family that holds, and the executives who run.
Capital allocated by evidence
Every holding on the same product-market matrix, scored on profit, advantage, growth and risk, with its market reality checked from outside. The family sees where the next dollar earns most — and where history, not evidence, has been deciding.
One review across the holdings
Each operating CEO on the same two pages. The family office reads the same monthly review in every company, finds the laggard early, and backs the CEO who is actually moving. Roll-up intelligence without a layer of reporting staff.
A next generation that can defend the choices
When the strategy is a written model — assumptions, choices, numbers, owners — rather than a memory held by one generation, the next one can argue about the assumptions instead of the loyalties. That is what a succession needs and rarely has.
Where family capital stalls
The decision discussed for years
A legacy line everyone knows is dying. A market everyone knows should be entered. Patient capital is the family's real advantage over listed and sponsor-backed rivals — until it becomes the reason a window closes unused.
The holding that lives on history
The business the founder built gets the capital, the attention and the benefit of the doubt. The business that earns the best return gets the budget it had last year.
The outside CEO who was never given the page
Professional management installed, then judged against expectations that were never written down. The executive runs it; the family holds it; nobody agreed the commitment.
The transition with no shared model
The next generation inherits the shares and a set of unspoken assumptions. Governance is set up; strategy is not. The first board meeting becomes a referendum on the past.
How it runs
The same discipline we use with sponsors, adjusted for the room.
Owners and operators in the same sessions
The family principal and the operating CEO build the strategy together, in eight to twelve weeks. Nobody receives a plan; both rooms write it. The family approves it as a commitment; the executive team delivers it.
One page per holding, one review for the office
Five Strategic Numbers per company, a named owner for each, a monthly review the family office can read the same way across every holding — and a quarterly look at the whole portfolio through the same lens.
Discretion as a working rule
Senior partners only. No junior staff, no case studies with your name on them, no roadshow. The results on our Proof page are anonymised for a reason.
Having subscribed to the methodology, successfully defining, executing and achieving strategy becomes much more clear and attainable. Strategy moves from opaque to transparent, as well as easily communicated throughout the company.
Dan Starck — Former CEO, Apria Healthcare, a Blackstone company
Bring us the holding you are least sure about.
One page on the company, the decision in front of the family, and the date it has to be made by. One page back within a week, to the principal only.
Start the conversationPrefer to start alone?
Five strategic questions every CEO should be able to answer before the next planning cycle. One page from the MOVE system.
Download the five questions (PDF)What is in front of you this quarter?
A senior partner reads it. One page back within five working days: what we see, three questions for your team, a straight answer on fit. Confidential.
Or start alone: the five questions (PDF)